On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen – The Atlantic

5 Nov

The third band harrassed by the chopper continuously at the trap site!

The third band harassed by the chopper continuously while at the Newark Valley trap site! BLM Roundup Triple B HMA, ©2011 Afroditi Katsikis

Considering Sally Jewel’s recent statements about the BLM wild horse and burro issues, it certainly looks like Sally Jewel has not read the NAS report’s criticisms of BLM’s lack of appropriate management. Andrew Cohen asks a very good question:

“Secretary Jewell seems to be willfully ignoring a report by the National Academy of Sciences. Why?”

Nearly seven months into her tenure as Secretary of the Interior, Sally Jewell last Thursday at last made her first extended public comments about one of the most controversial and under-reported aspects of her portfolio as steward of the nation’s public lands. Speaking at the National Press Club, she addressed in detail a question about the nation’s beleaguered wild horses, which in the past few years have been rounded up by the tens of thousands from those public lands and dispatched to vast holding facilities at great cost to the American taxpayer (and to the great benefit of the ranching and livestock industries).

It was not an auspicious debut. Jewell did not directly answer the question posed to her. And the affirmative statement she did make about the herds was unsupported by key facts revealed in June in a report by the National Academy of Sciences that was sharply critical of Bureau of Land Management’s practices and policies toward the horses. She offered a series of platitudes—e.g. “So we are working on it. And we are going to work on it”—while wild horses are being sold to slaughter in contravention of federal law and policy. Time is of the essence here but there was no hint of urgency in the Secretary’s remarks.

There are two explanations for the Secretary’s performance and neither can be seen as encouraging for wild horse advocates (or fans of good governance in general, for that matter). The first is that, despite her extensive scientific background, Jewell does not grasp the essence of the scientific criticism the NAS has offered about the BLM’s work. And the second is that she does grasp the extent of the problem the NAS identified—she has done her homework—but that she has neither the political desire nor the bureaucratic will to implement the reforms the scientists suggest. Either way, from an Obama Administration official who talks a great deal about conservation and the environment, who says she is a friend to animals and no tool to corporate interests, it doesn’t bode well for the federally-protected horses.

The National Academy of Sciences Report

It has been exactly five months since the National Academy of Sciences released its long-awaited report titled “Using Science to Improve the BLM Wild Horse and Burro Program.” In it, some of the nation’s leading scientists were direct and unambiguous about the failures of the BLM to administer the horses: “The Wild Horse and Burro Program has not used scientifically rigorous methods to estimate the population sizes of horses and burros, to model the effects of management actions on the animals, or to assess the availability and use of forage on range lands,” the scientists concluded.

In other words, after years of speculation and debate, the NAS concluded that the BLM was using both bad math and faulty science to justify one of its most controversial (and expensive) wild horse management practices. Wild horse advocates have long argued, for example, that the herds don’t have nearly the negative impact on range lands that cattle and sheep do. Nor, advocates have long claimed, has the BLM accurately counted the number of wild horses on public lands or properly evaluated ways in which more horses can safely be kept there.

The NAS Report in June did not prove these allegations to be true. But at the very least it cast serious doubt on the arguments the BLM (and the ranching and livestock industries) have made in support of the current practices.  It raises profound questions, in other words, about whether the advocates are right about the BLM and the need for its overhaul. Also relevant to Thursday’s public comments by Jewell was this part of the NAS Report that explained what the BLM was doing wrong and how federal officials could remedy the problem:

Promising fertility-control methods are available to help limit this population growth, however. In addition, science-based methods exist for improving population estimates, predicting the effects of management practices in order to maintain genetically diverse, healthy populations, and estimating the productivity of rangelands. Greater transparency in how science-based methods are used to inform management decisions may help increase public confidence in the Wild Horse and Burro Program.

Since June, I have repeatedly asked Secretary Jewell, through her spokeswoman, to respond to the National Academy’s work. I have asked the secretary, again through a spokeswoman, to respond more generally to the plight of the nation’s wild horses as they become more and more vulnerable to mistreatment or slaughter. Over and over again those requests have been declined. I was told to be patient, that the secretary was working through the NAS Report, and that the time would come when there would be a substantive response. Evidently, that time has come.

July On Capitol Hill

To put into better perspective last week’s comments by Secretary Jewell, I need to briefly digress. First, Secretary Jewell said she wanted to wait for the results of the NAS Report before commenting upon the plight of the wild horses. Then, on July 17th, she appeared at a hearing on Capitol Hill just a few weeks after the NAS Report was issued. At the time, she had an exchange with Rep. Raul Grijalva, a Democrat from Arizona with a long history of sense and sensibility toward the nation’s wild horses. He framed his question to her the following way:

Madame Secretary, the Wild Horse and Burro program managed by BLM has been a persistent source of criticism, controversy, and I believe in need of serious reform and an overhaul.  And much of that criticism that has been leveled at the program was reaffirmed by an independent review by the National Academy of Sciences.

And so in light of that independent review, do you see a need to restructure the program in order to both save money and, just as importantly, guarantee humane treatment of Wild Horses and Burros in that program?

And here is how Secretary Jewell responded at the time:

Congressman Grijalva, it’s a very difficult situation. Yes, the National Academy of Sciences program validated one of the concerns that the BLM has had which is the 20 percent per year reproduction rate of Wild Horses and Burros and the way that program is currently being handled. It’s very expensive and very challenging.

So we’re reviewing the report in detail, things like contraception figuring out what our options will be and certainly, the goal would be to address this in a way that’s more effective than what has been done on the past. And I know that BLM is committed to doing that.

Read More of Andrew Cohen’s article on The Atlantic:

On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen – The Atlantic.

Advertisements

9 Responses to “On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen – The Atlantic”

  1. Barbara Ries November 5, 2013 at 11:14 pm #

    It seems like the Sec of Interior conversation focused on developing better birth control. I think ISPMB has already developed the research for birth control and BLM received her study. I hate to see any of Salley’s relatives become sterile not producing any ideas about their future. I sorry but her disrespect for the wild horses is upfront and noticed as I am proud to be an advocate and pro life….

    Like

    • WestDeltaGirl November 7, 2013 at 3:24 pm #

      The NAS report that came out in June discussed every kind of contraceptive procedure as well as how the BLM’s roundup exacerbate the breeding! It’s obvious that Sally Jewel has not read the report! One would think that during all her traveling around the country making appearances on various public lands she would at least have read the report!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. cindymendoza47 September 29, 2014 at 12:39 pm #

    Reblogged this on cindymendoza47.

    Like

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. BLM must reconsider its policies on wild horses | Hippies for Horses - November 12, 2013

    […] On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen… (hippies4horses.wordpress.com) […]

    Like

  2. The Desert Independent | Hippies for Horses - November 12, 2013

    […] On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen… (hippies4horses.wordpress.com) […]

    Like

  3. Where is the Shelter for BLM Wild Horses and Burros in Holding Pens | Hippies for Horses - November 20, 2013

    […] On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen… (hippies4horses.wordpress.com) […]

    Like

  4. BLM Helicopter Roundups Continue to Destroy Wild Horse Herds | Hippies for Horses - November 27, 2013

    […] On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen… (hippies4horses.wordpress.com) […]

    Like

  5. Lion: The Stallion that Made a Difference in My Life | Hippies for Horses - December 8, 2013

    […] On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen… (hippies4horses.wordpress.com) […]

    Like

  6. Why Did the 2010 Calico Roundup Occur in the Dead of Winter? | Hippies for Horses - September 28, 2014

    […] On Wild Horses, the Secretary of the Interior Needs to Listen to the Scientists – Andrew Cohen… […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: